12100f Vs 10400f

5 min read Jun 27, 2024
12100f Vs 10400f

Comparison of 12100F and 10400F: Which One is Better?

When it comes to high-performance CPUs, two popular options from Intel are the 12100F and 10400F. Both processors offer impressive speeds and features, but they have some key differences that set them apart. In this article, we'll dive into the details of each processor and compare their performance, power consumption, and features to help you decide which one is better for your needs.

Performance Comparison

Clock Speeds

The 12100F has a base clock speed of 3.3 GHz, which can turbo boost up to 4.8 GHz. On the other hand, the 10400F has a base clock speed of 2.9 GHz, which can turbo boost up to 4.3 GHz. This means that the 12100F has a higher clock speed out of the box, which translates to better performance in most applications.

Cores and Threads

Both processors have 6 cores and 12 threads, which is great for multitasking and running multiple applications simultaneously. However, the 12100F has a higher IPC (instructions per clock) rate, which means it can execute more instructions per clock cycle than the 10400F.

Cache Memory

The 12100F has a larger cache memory of 12MB, compared to the 10400F's 9MB cache. A larger cache means faster access to frequently used data, which can result in better performance.

Power Consumption

TDP

The 12100F has a TDP (thermal design power) of 65W, while the 10400F has a TDP of 65W as well. This means that both processors have the same power consumption, which is relatively low compared to other high-performance CPUs.

Power Efficiency

Although both processors have the same TDP, the 12100F is more power-efficient due to its newer architecture. This means that it can deliver better performance while consuming the same amount of power as the 10400F.

Features Comparison

Integrated Graphics

The 12100F comes with Intel UHD Graphics 750, which is a more powerful integrated graphics processor compared to the 10400F's Intel UHD Graphics 630.

PCIe Lanes

The 12100F has 20 PCIe lanes, while the 10400F has 16 PCIe lanes. This means that the 12100F can support more peripherals and devices, such as graphics cards and SSDs.

Hyper-Threading

Both processors support Hyper-Threading, which allows each core to handle two threads simultaneously. This feature is great for applications that take advantage of multi-threading, such as video editing and 3D rendering.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the 12100F is the better processor compared to the 10400F. It offers higher clock speeds, a larger cache, and better power efficiency. Additionally, it comes with more PCIe lanes and a more powerful integrated graphics processor. However, the 10400F is still a great option for those who want a high-performance processor without breaking the bank.

Recommendation

If you're looking for the best performance and don't mind paying a premium, go for the 12100F. However, if you're on a budget and still want a high-performance processor, the 10400F is a great option.

Final Verdict

The 12100F is the clear winner in this comparison, but the 10400F is still a great option for those who want a high-performance processor at a lower price point. Ultimately, the choice depends on your budget and performance requirements.

Related Post


Latest Posts


Featured Posts